After separation, there may be a point in time when a parent would like to relocate with a child to another town, state or country. In this article, we will look at when and how child relocation can occur, together with what the courts consider when determining relocation matters.
A parent may desire a move for a magnitude of reasons:
Relocation can be intrastate, interstate or overseas. Generally, a matter is considered to be a “relocation” matter, where a parent proposes to change a child’s primary place of residence a distance that would impose significant practical difficulties on the other parent.
Importantly, there is no specific distance which categorises a matter as being a relocation matter. There may be a proposal to move a child’s principal place of residence 2 hours' drive away or across international borders. Either may be considered a relocation matter.
In order for a parent to relocate with a child, where there is equal shared parental responsibility, they must either have the other parent’s consent or an order of the Court.
So simply put, yes – consent of both parents is necessary.
If the other parent does not consent, relocation may still be possible if the Court determines that it is in the best interests of the child and, accordingly, makes an order permitting a parent to relocate with a child.
If a parent does not seek consent prior to relocating, the Court can make orders that the parent and the child return.
If the Court finds a person has breached a parenting order without reasonable excuse, it may impose a penalty.
Depending on the situation and the type of contravention, the Court may order that the person who breached the order:
Relocation matters are determined in the same manner as any parenting matter. The paramount consideration is what is in the child’s best interests.
Consideration is also given to what is reasonably practicable in all the circumstances. This is particularly relevant for relocation matters, given distance naturally creates a practical burden on one parent.
In relocation matters, the question the Court is asked to determine is:
‘Is it in the child’s best interests to relocate to Country X or City Y or State Z?’
The court must then consider whether the orders proposed are reasonably practicable in all the circumstances.
In determining what is in a child’s best interests, the Court turns its mind to the primary and additional considerations set out in Section 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”).
The primary considerations are:
The Court is to give greater weight to the second consideration; the need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm from being subjected to, or exposed to, abuse, neglect or family violence.
The additional considerations are discussed in detail in our article “Parenting orders for spending time with children”.
The additional considerations that are particularly relevant in relocation matters may include:
The factors the Court takes into account in determining what is reasonably practicable, include:
These factors are especially relevant in relocation matters.
Naturally, in relocation matters, the major practical difficulty will be travel and the costs associated with that travel.
If you are considering relocation or if you’d like to discuss your divorce with a lawyer or arrange an initial consultation, feel free to get in touch with one of our team members.
Family Lawyers Perth & Sydney
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Meillon & Bright Family Lawyers.