Separating from your partner is often stressful enough without worrying that assets are being hidden when it comes to negotiating a property settlement. Under Australian family law, both parties must make full and frank disclosure of their finances when resolving property matters. Without full and frank disclosure, there is always the opportunity to reopen proceedings in time.
If you suspect your ex is not being open about assets and there is more than what is being disclosed, unfortunately, you may need Court intervention to seek orders for the production of documents or, otherwise, a subpoena.
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (and the Family Court of Western Australia) require each party to give continuous, full and frank disclosure of all financial matters when a matter is litigated before the Court.
The duty of disclosure begins before an application is filed, continues through negotiations and court proceedings, and only ends when your matter is finalised (whether by consent or judicial determination).
Disclosure means providing all information and documents relevant to your financial circumstances, even if they are unhelpful to you. Relevant documents include:
If someone fails to disclose, the court can penalise them heavily. It can impose costs orders, draw negative inferences, or even set aside any agreement obtained without full disclosure.
You can read more about disclosure obligations in our earlier blog, “What is the duty of disclosure?”
Not every unusual transaction means dishonesty, but patterns of behaviour may raise concerns.
Watch for:
Australian family law provides several tools to stop assets disappearing and to uncover hidden assets.
If there is a risk property will be sold, transferred or hidden, the court can make urgent orders to “freeze” the asset. These orders may restrain not just your former partner, but also third parties (like banks) from dealing with the asset.
If your ex refuses disclosure, the court can order it. Subpoenas can compel banks, employers, accountants and others to produce records. Independent valuations can be ordered for real estate, businesses, vehicles and superannuation interests to ensure reliable figures are used.
If assets were transferred to reduce the property pool, the court can undo the transaction. Agreements or even court orders can also be set aside if they were obtained by fraud or non-disclosure.
Complex structures do not diminish your duty of disclosure. The court considers all assets associated through companies, trusts and superannuation, including self-managed super. It looks at the following:
If your ex has effective control over an entity, the court can consider the assets or benefits of that entity when making orders.
Even if you are trying to resolve matters without going to court, the same disclosure rules apply. Both parties must exchange full financial documents in mediation or settlement discussions so the property pool can be agreed.
If your ex doesn’t comply, your lawyer can:
Non-disclosure in family law proceedings can lead to significant consequences for a non-disclosing party:
The duty of disclosure applies in both marriage and de facto property settlements. While sections of the Family Law Act differ (s79 for marriages and s90SM for de facto), the principles around disclosure, asset preservation and setting aside transactions are the same.
Your lawyer can seek orders for specific disclosure. If there is continued non-compliance, subpoenas can be issued to the relevant organisations, including banks. The court may also make costs orders against the non-compliant party.
Yes. You can apply urgently for a freezing or preservation order to restrain the sale. You need evidence there is a real risk of disposal that would prejudice your case.
We signed a deal and I later discovered hidden assets. Is it too late to revisit settlement?
Not necessarily. Agreements and even court orders can be set aside if they were obtained through non-disclosure, fraud or similar misconduct. Get legal advice promptly because delay can make things harder.
Yes. The duty of disclosure is strict. If privacy is a concern, your lawyer can propose confidentiality undertakings. Generally, financial documents obtained during family law proceedings cannot be used for other purposes. You can read more about this in our earlier blog, “Can I use financial information disclosed during property settlement for another purpose?”
Suspecting assets are being hidden can be overwhelming. A family lawyer can explain your options, apply for urgent preservation orders, issue subpoenas, and ensure disclosure rules are enforced. Having the right advice early gives you the best chance of protecting the property pool and achieving a fair outcome.
Family Lawyers Perth & Sydney
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Meillon & Bright Family Lawyers.