A family law financial agreement, often called a Binding Financial Agreement or BFA, is only enforceable if it strictly complies with Australian law. This article explains how to make a family law financial agreement legally binding, including when it can be used, the legal requirements, common mistakes, and when agreements can be set aside by a court.
A family law financial agreement is a private contract between parties to a marriage or de facto relationship. It sets out how property, debts, financial resources and spousal maintenance will be dealt with if in the event of separation
Financial agreements can be made:
Financial agreements are often used in situations such as:
Financial agreements are not suitable or necessary for every relationship, and careful legal advice is essential.
Financial agreements are governed by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) or the Family Cort Act 1997 (WA) – for de facto parties in WA. Both Acts set out specific requirements that must be met before an agreement will be legally binding.
Courts enforce these requirements strictly. Even small technical errors can make an agreement unenforceable.
To be legally binding, a family law financial agreement must meet the following requirements.
The agreement must be a written document. Verbal agreements and informal arrangements are not legally binding under family law.
This is one of the most important requirements.
Before signing, each party must receive independent legal advice about:
Each lawyer must sign a statement confirming that legal advice was provided. These certificates must be exchanged between the parties and annexed to the Agreement.
Missing, defective, or unexchanged certificates may render the agreement unenforceable.
The agreement must clearly state which section of the Act it is made under, depending on whether it is:
for de facto relationships.
Using the wrong section, or failing to specify it, is a common drafting error.
An agreement must be entered into freely and voluntarily for it to be enforceable.
Courts may set aside an agreement where there is:
A legally binding financial agreement must be carefully drafted. Poor drafting is a primary reason an agreement may fail.
Common drafting issues include:
Courts may set aside a financial agreement if:
Financial agreements are not immune from challenge. Careful preparation reduces risk but cannot remove it entirely.
To maximise enforceability of your financial agreement:
No. Financial agreements are private contracts. Courts make or approve court orders. Both can finalise property matters, but they operate differently.
No. Without independent legal advice and lawyer certificates, the agreement will not be legally binding.
No. They are commonly used by people with modest assets who want certainty and to avoid future legal costs.
Yes. Parties can terminate or replace an agreement with a new one, provided the legal requirements are met.
Yes, but superannuation must be dealt with carefully and clearly to avoid drafting errors.
A family law financial agreement provides certainty, protects assets, and reduces conflict when prepared correctly.
Strict legal requirements apply, and mistakes can be costly. Obtaining independent legal advice early and ensuring careful drafting are the key steps to making a financial agreement legally binding in Australia.
Family Lawyers Perth & Sydney
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Meillon & Bright Family Lawyers.