A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is a legal contract which sets out how a couple’s assets, liabilities, superannuation entitlements and financial resources will be divided if they separate or divorce. While a BFA is generally binding, there are some circumstances where it can be challenged or overturned by a court.
In this article, we’ll explore how BFAs work, the grounds on which they can be overturned, and what you can do if you believe your agreement is unfair or invalid.
A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is sometimes referred to as a "prenup" or "post-nup". Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) or the Family Court Act 1997 (WA) (for de facto parties in Western Australia), couples can enter into a BFA:
The main purpose of a BFA is to avoid future disputes by clearly outlining how property, superannuation, debts and spousal maintenance will be handled if separation occurs.
Yes, but only if certain legal requirements are met. For a BFA to be valid and enforceable:
If any of these steps are missing or mishandled, the BFA may be open to a challenge.
The Family Court of Western Australia or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia may set aside a BFA in the following situations.
If one party deliberately hides or misrepresents assets, income or debts at the time of the agreement, the court may set the BFA aside. Full and honest disclosure is required.
If a party was pressured or intimidated into signing a BFA, even subtly, the agreement may not be valid. This includes emotional or financial pressure, or lack of time to properly consider the agreement.
Where one party has taken advantage of the other's vulnerability (such as illness, emotional dependence or lack of education), a court may find the agreement to be unfair and unenforceable.
Each party must receive independent legal advice before signing a BFA. A financial agreement may not be regarded as binding if legal advice was not given or was inadequate, or if a Certificate of Independent Legal Advice is not attached to the agreement.
The court may overturn a BFA if circumstances have changed significantly, especially where children are involved, and enforcing the agreement would cause hardship.
If the court sets aside a Binding Financial Agreement, it may:
Yes, but only if you have strong legal grounds. It’s not enough to simply regret signing the agreement or think you could do better financially without it. If you believe your BFA may be invalid or unfair, it’s important to speak to a family lawyer.
A lawyer can help you assess:
To minimise the risk of your BFA being overturned:
While Binding Financial Agreements are a valuable legal tool, it’s important to understand that, under certain circumstances, they may not be enforceable. Courts take a strict approach to ensure fairness and proper legal process.
If you are entering into or disputing a BFA, you should seek legal advice and assistance from an experienced family lawyer.
Family Lawyers Perth & Sydney
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Meillon & Bright Family Lawyers.