When going through a separation or divorce, one of the most difficult aspects can be working out how to divide property. This process can become even more complex when one partner has received a personal injury lump sum payment during or around the time of the relationship.
In this article, we explain how personal injury compensation payouts are treated during property settlement negotiations under Australian family law, including key factors the courts consider and how these payments may (or may not) be divided.
In Australia, property settlement refers to the legal process of dividing assets and liabilities between separating couples. This includes:
This process is governed by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), which aims to ensure that outcomes are just and equitable in each case. Generally, the Court works through four steps:
Personal injury payouts are considered relevant when the parties are identifying and valuing the asset pool, as well as when looking at their contributions to the relationship.
A personal injury lump sum is a one-off payment awarded to someone who suffers an injury or illness related to, for example:
These payments are often intended to cover pain and suffering (a lump sum component), loss of income, medical expenses and future care or assistance (also a lump sum component). Because they can be large in value, they may significantly affect the asset pool in a property settlement.
Not always. There is no strict or automatic rule in Australian family law requiring that a personal injury payout be included in the property pool. Instead, the Court takes a discretionary approach.
In some cases, the Court will treat a personal injury payout as part of the assets to be divided between both partners. In other situations, it may be seen as a contribution made by one person only, or even as money that should be kept separate from the total asset pool altogether.
If a person received a personal injury payout before the relationship began and kept the funds separate (e.g. in an individual account), it may be treated as a pre-relationship asset. In short relationships, the other party may not be entitled to a share.
If the payout was used to buy a shared home, fund holidays, or support the other (non-injured) partner, it may be seen as a joint contribution. The injured party may not be entitled to retain the full amount.
If the injured party has ongoing health problems or cannot work, the Court may include the payout in the asset pool but adjust the settlement in their favour due to their greater future needs.
If you want to protect your compensation from being divided in a future separation, consider:
These steps won’t guarantee the payout is excluded from the asset pool, but they strengthen the argument that it was a personal asset rather than a joint asset.
It is possible, but not guaranteed. You can argue that a personal injury lump sum should be quarantined (excluded) from the asset pool. The success of this argument depends on:
In longer relationships with pooled/shared finances, it is rare that the entire payout will be excluded from the asset pool for distribution.
Property settlements involving personal injury payouts are legally complex and require careful consideration. To achieve a fair and reasonable outcome:
Personal injury payouts add a layer of complexity to separation and divorce. Every case is different, and how the payout is treated depends on the specific facts. Courts will consider when the payout was received, its purpose, how it was used, and each party’s needs.
Legal advice and preparation are critical to ensuring your rights are protected during the division of property.
Family Lawyers Perth & Sydney
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Meillon & Bright Family Lawyers.