From June 2025, Australian family law changed the way courts in most jurisdictions deal with family pets in property settlements. Pets are no longer treated as just another piece of property. Instead, they are recognised as “companion animals” – a special category with rules that reflect their role in family life. This means the court looks beyond whose name is on the microchip or registration and considers how the animal is cared for, attachment to family members, including children, and the impact of family violence.
These reforms aim to deliver fairer and more practical outcomes when families separate, and a pet is involved.
When Parliament passed the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 (Cth) (‘the Act’), which amended the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), most reforms related to financial and property matters came into effect from 10 June 2025.
The Act includes, for the first time, a definition of companion animal and a list of considerations the court must weigh up when deciding who keeps a family pet. It also makes clear what types of orders courts can and cannot make about pets.
In plain English, a companion animal is an animal kept mainly for company. The Act expressly excludes animals that are:
Put simply, most family pets (for example, dogs, cats and similar household animals) are companion animals, while working livestock, commercial breeding animals and service animals are not.
Factors the court must consider when dealing with companion animals
The same legal process applies whether you are married or in a de facto relationship (except for de facto parties in Western Australia). For both married couples (section 79 of the Act) and de facto couples in all states except WA (section 90SM), the court must consider specific factors when making an order about a companion animal.
The court looks at things such as:
The court’s powers with regard to companion animals are intentionally limited. It can order:
Importantly, the court cannot order shared ownership or a roster for spending time with the pet. So, unlike with children, there is no legal mechanism for alternating weeks with the dog or splitting the school holidays with the cat. If you are seeking shared arrangements for the care of pets, this must be agreed privately between the parties.
Property settlements for de facto parties in Western Australia are not dealt with pursuant to the Act. The relevant legislation for de facto parties in Western Australia is the Family Court Act 1997 (WA).
As at the time of publishing (October 2025), the Family Court Act 1997 (WA) has not been amended to reflect the changes in the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 (Cth). Therefore, for de facto parties in Western Australia, there are no specific rules for pets and pets are treated as another piece of property.
It is likely the Family Court Act 1997 (WA) will be amended to mirror the Act, but we do not know when this will occur.
The June 2025 reforms recognise the link between family violence and harm to pets. Courts must now consider both:
The law also requires courts to consider the broader financial impact of family violence in property settlements. If you or your pet is at risk, it is important to tell your lawyer as soon as possible so urgent protective steps can be taken.
If you and your former partner cannot agree about pet ownership or care, you should consider gathering evidence that shows day-to-day responsibility and financial contributions, as well as any safety concerns.
Helpful documents and relevant information include:
Tip: When in doubt, think about what evidence proves who actually looks after the animal on a regular basis – who feeds them, pays for them and spends time with them. That’s what matters most to the courts.
Court orders about pets can be limiting, so where it’s safe and practical, reaching your own agreement with your former partner may work better.
You can draft a private agreement, but keep in mind it will not be legally enforceable unless it is formalised in a Binding Financial Agreement.
Things you can consider when drafting arrangements in relation to pets include:
If you reach your own agreement about sole ownership, transfer of ownership or the sale of your pet, then the court can also formalise your agreement by way of Consent Orders.
No. The court cannot make shared-care or time-spending orders for a companion animal. It can only order sole ownership, a consented transfer or sale. Shared arrangements are a matter for private agreement.
No. Pets remain property in law, but as companion animals they are considered under a dedicated checklist that looks at care, attachment and safety, including family violence and cruelty.
No. Assistance animals under the Disability Discrimination Act (for example, guide dogs) are specifically excluded from the companion animal definition. Animals kept for business, agriculture or laboratory use are also excluded.
You should seek legal advice if there is a risk a pet may be sold, given away or harmed, or if family violence is involved. The broader property and family violence reforms give the court tools to protect parties and account for the safety and economic impacts of abuse when making orders.
Sorting out what happens with a family pet after separation can be stressful – especially when you’re also dealing with property and parenting arrangements.
A family lawyer can help you:
The aim is always a fair and workable solution that reflects day-to-day realities and protects both you and your companion animal’s well-being.
Family Lawyers Perth & Sydney
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Meillon & Bright Family Lawyers.